Tag Archives: Dawes

Guitar Wars – Martin Fights to Save Wildlife and Its Brand

“Please Papa can I go. Down to Richmond to the traveling show. Please Papa don’t you say I can’t. I just want to see the elephant.” See The Elephant, music and lyrics by James McMurtry.

I’m not a lucky person. I’ve never won the lottery, not even a five-dollar scratch-off. And when it comes to art, I’d have better luck at a raffle drawing than drawing an object, portrait, or thing. But this past weekend, I found myself in front of a booth run by Martin Guitar being invited to enter a contest that would require both luck and artistic talent to win.

442319.DOCFor those not familiar with the hierarchy of guitar-dom, C.F. Martin & Co. of Nazareth, PA. occupies the pinnacle of the acoustic guitar realm. (For those really not familiar with these six and 12 string instruments, “acoustics” are the hollow wooden ones).

The contest seemed simple—it was part of Martin’s “Draw an Elephant, Save an Elephant” campaign directed to raising awareness for the plight of that endangered species. The connection between elephants and guitars seemed a bit obscure, considering that the pachyderms are more likely to stomp on a guitar than to fingerpick one. But who was I to scoff at a worthy cause? Besides, I’ve been tuned-in to the evils and perils of poaching elephants in the jungle ever since watching Tarzan and the Ivory Hunters at a 25-cent Saturday matinee back in the day. As it turns out, Martin Guitar has a long history of environmental stewardship. Years ago, Martin Guitar substituted a synthetic for the ivory used on its instruments.

To enter this contest, #Save Elephant, all you had to do was draw an elephant and you were eligible to win a prize. Pretty simple. But to me, it was daunting. I had been kicked out of remedial art class in elementary school. So my “flight” instincts kicked-in.

But the folks running Martin’s booth were friendly, and my son, a graphic designer, egged me on. I decided to give it a shot. After all, we were at The Newport Folk Festival, we’d been enjoying energetic and passionate performances across three stages strategically placed around an old fortress that once protected Rhode Island from pirates and non-musical British invasions. The sun shone and spirits were high. And I was surrounded by an array of gorgeous C.F. Martin guitars—the same brand made by this family company since 1833 and played by legends and musical greats for over a century. Hank Williams strummed a Martin model D-28 that Neil Young now owns and plays in concert. Woody Guthrie owned several Martins. And Bob Dylan played a Martin guitar before famously picking up an electric Fender Stratocaster at Newport 50 years ago this past week, shattering the folk music world, prompting boos from the crowd, and changing popular music forever. (A 50th anniversary tribute to this seminal moment from 1965 capped this year’s Newport weekend. The infamous Fender was on hand, strummed by Taylor Goldsmith, a member of the indie-folk band Dawes, leading a soaring version of Maggie’s Farm, backed by keyboard legend Al Kooper who played the same organ lines when Dylan performed that song five decades earlier.)

Martin was offering one prize per hour, and for all I knew, a guitar could have been one of them. So rather than succumb to my inhibitions and phobias, I reached for a pen and began drawing my elephant. I won’t say it was elegant. I won’t say is was attractive. But my drawing definitely captures a certain elephantine essence. I eschewed cubism and abstract expressionism for my own brand of post-modern realism, that is to say, you’d have no trouble recognizing the trunk, ears, tusks, and stumpy legs of my elephant masterpiece.

442320.DOC

I signed my work, filled out the entry information, and went back to enjoying music and Newport Harbor breeze.

About an hour later, my cell phone rang. It was a call from “Allentown, PA.” Not knowing anyone from that part of the Keystone State, and being in the middle of a migration from one festival stage to the next, I almost declined the call. But instinct urged me to answer. “This is Martin Guitars. You’re our twelve-o’clock winner,” the caller said. I froze, disrupting the stampede of festival foot traffic, then I headed to the Martin Guitar booth. There I met Skip, who congratulated me and showed me a table piled with prizes. No, the guitars weren’t part of the contest. But I got to select a t-shirt with the original Martin logo and lettering, direct from the company archives:

442321.DOC

Admiring the logo, I mentioned that when I’m not attending music festivals and concerts, I’m a trademark lawyer, and told him about my interest in brands and their histories. We then discussed, how, as with many brands, the Martin logo and iconography have evolved. But the essence of Martin’s brand identity has remained constant through the use of the C.F. Martin name, and through continuous use of Martin’s simple, iconic, headstock design:

442322.DOC

I then learned from Skip that Martin Guitar was no stranger to intellectual property battles. A few years ago, on a visit to China, the company’s sixth-generation CEO, Chris Martin, discovered a collection of guitars that looked like genuine Martins, but were actually poorly made counterfeits. (Where a genuine Martin takes weeks to make by hand and may sell for several thousands of dollars, the Chinese company was mass-producing its ersatz Martins and selling them for a few hundred dollars each). It turned out that another company had registered Martin’s trademark in China, and was hijacking Martin’s reputation under the protection of Chinese law. (Michael Jordan faces similarly vexing copycats of his name and the “Jumpman” logo.)

Martin took action, registering the shape of its iconic headstock as a trademark in the United States Patent and Trademark Office:

442323.DOC

(Registration No. 3,048,307). Martin also recruited Pennsylvania Senator Robert Casey to come to its aid. But the problems Martin faced in China stem from that country’s legal system. Chinese trademark law protect the first company to file for a mark in that country, even if that company is hijacking a brand that’s famous elsewhere in the world. And the law in China lets that company sue if the Real McCoy tries to sell its genuine goods in China.

Martin Guitar’s experience in China highlights the need for companies with strong U.S. brands and worldwide reputations to take preemptive action. Brand owners need to be proactive, aggressive, and creative. They should consider trademark registrations for key brand names, logos, and shapes in key countries, especially ones like China with reputations for counterfeiting. Like Martin Guitar, don’t just register words, look at products shapes and designs, which can also qualify for protection under trademark and patent law. And be vigilant. Otherwise, like the elephants that gave rise to this story, a famous trademark may be prone to poaching, which can weaken a brand, and in rare cases, drive it to the point of extinction. And the last thing anyone needs is another crude drawing from me trying to save another endangered species.

QUOTE OF THE DAY: “Sometimes the nicest thing to do with a guitar is just look at it.” Thom Yorke.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Puffery: It’s Not Just For Pastry

“Puff the magic dragon lived by the sea and frolicked in the Autumn mist in a land called Honolee.” Puff The Magic Dragon by Peter, Paul, and Mary

I love satellite radio, although I was late to the party. I resisted taking the plunge, figuring that the programmers at XM/Sirius couldn’t approach, much less duplicate, the eclectic, genre-bending variety provided by my favorite terrestrial station, WXPN in Philadelphia (which I enjoy in D.C. courtesy of the Internet). But when my trusty car expired, I replaced it with a new model that came with a free trial subscription to Sirius/XM. I took me less than the ride home from the dealership to be hooked. Sure, each station might play a limited range of music–but the sheer variety of music across the Sirius/XM spectrum is mind-blowing, not to mention all the news, sports, comedy, and last but not least, Howard Stern. On any given commute, I can be serenaded by old stalwarts like Crosby, Stills, and Nash and Neil Young, their modern-day progeny such as Dawes, Fleet Foxes, and Deer Tick, old-school and Outlaw country from Willie, Waylon, Merle, and McMurtry, and, of course, Elvis, Sinatra, The Boss, The Dead, and Pearl Jam, all of whom have channels devoted to them.

What does any of this have to do with Softrights? Not much I confess. But the other day, while flipping through the satellite dial, I alighted on Peter, Paul, and Mary wistfully singing “Puff The Magic Dragon.” Since I hadn’t heard it in years, I left the station on while my mind absorbed the story of little Jackie and his faithful dragon Puff. Soon, however, my mind began wandering, and as it often does, it wandered far afield, in this case, from Honolee to IP. Yes, Puff the Magic Dragon got me thinking about advertising law, and the concept know as “puffery.”

What is puffery? In ordinary parlance, the word conjures up someone inflating his or her chest while inflating the truth. As a legal term, “puffing” means pretty much the same thing–referring to statements so obviously vague, unrealistic, silly, exaggerated, boastful, or matters of opinion that no reasonable consumer would believe them. An ad that touts something as “better”, “best”, “the greatest”, and “finest” typically signals puffery. Or when an ad uses slippery terms like “helps”, “can be”, “fights”, and “tastes like,” it’s usually a sign that puff is sure to follow.

So what’s the significance of calling an ad puffery? Well, an ad that nobody believes or takes seriously cannot be considered false or misleading and thus should be immune from liability under the Lanham Act and state laws that prohibit false and misleading advertising.

But when it comes to IP law, there’s often a rub. One person’s “puffery” can often be someone else’s falsehood and can provoke a lawsuit. And indeed, the casebooks are replete with court decisions where Solomonic judges and juries have been called on to separate the false advertising wheat from the puffery chaff (or vice versa). And so, these claims have sparked lawsuits, even though all were eventually found to be puffery, not misleading: advertising a computer accessory as “redesigned and improved”; the slogans “AMERICA’S FAVORITE PASTA” and “Better Ingredients, Better Pizza”; Blue Cross/Blue Shield’s claim that its health coverage was “better than” a health maintenance organization; advertising a computerized chess game as “new” and “new technology” and “like having Karpov as your opponent”; Claiming “unprecedented clarity” in a laboratory computer imaging device used to study cells to detect cancer; Abercrombie & Fitch’s claim “Our most original pant since 1892 … Pure Abercrombie & Fitch design and fit”; the claim that Speedo suits help swimmers compete at the highest level; promoting POWERADE as “The Complete Sports Drink” ; and claims that HUGGIES diapers had a “natural fit” and “fit more naturally.” Each of these claims ultimately was found to be innocuous, benign, harmless, hyperbole, subjective, or mere opinion. But the advertisers had to put up a legal fight to defend these boastful ads.

So what’s an advertiser to do? For one thing, make sure you can prove any specific, verifiable claims about product performance or capability. And if your goal is to achieve “puffery” status, go big with your hyperbole, or be prepared to go to court.

QUOTE OF THE DAY: “The deepest thing in any one is the conviction of the bad luck that follows boasting.”
Gertrude Stein

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized