Tag Archives: Beatles

Turtles to Satellite Radio: Get Sirius About Pre 72 Public Performance Royalties

“Got a idea tell you what let’s do
Let’s go out to that place on the Turtle Bayou
We’ll maybe get lucky, maybe get shot
It couldn’t be half of the trouble I got” Turtle Bayou by James McMurtry

You remember the Turtles? The mid ’60s group best known for the hit song “Happy Together?” The semi-parody love song that ended with the line “So Happy Together. How is the weather?” Not exactly the type of sheer profundity that propelled Lennon, McCartney, Dylan, and Paul Simon into Rock and Roll immortality. And yet, when it comes to the music of pre ’72 AM radio, the cornucopia of rock, soul, pop, psychedelic, country, and easy listening that all managed to coexist on stations such as WABC in New York and WFIL in Philly, the Turtles just may go down in history–not for their music, per se, but for their persistence in pursuing their legal rights.

It all has to do with the interplay between Federal Copyright law and state protection. In general, where Copyright is concerned, Federal law trumps state law under a doctrine called “preemption.” Simply but, when Congress passes a law to implement a constitutional right, like copyright or patents, the states generally can’t step in with laws of their own–otherwise, there could be overlap, inconsistencies, and confusion. But what about areas where Congress has chosen not to act? One of those areas concerns so-called “public performance rights” for songs recorded before 1972. Under current Federal Copyright law, when a satellite radio station plays a song recorded after 1972, the station pays royalties to the composer and to the performer. The latter royalty is called the “public performance right.” But this performance right applies only to songs recorded after 1972. Essentially, satellite radio gets to play pre-72 recording for free, according to Federal Law.

Many musicians with hit songs from before MTV object to this free-pass for old recordings. They claim that it robs them of income if not livelihoods. Facing the music, several states have passed laws to “correct” the situation. Not coincidentally, the biggest states to do this–New York, California, FLorida–are where many disgruntled makers of Golden Oldies live and work today.

Sirius satellite radio has been fighting these state laws; and the band that has been their defender is not the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, The Who, or any other giants of the Woodstock era. No, it’s the Turtles who have come out of music history’s shell to press the case for pre ’72 royalties under state law.

And like that mythical contest that pit a speedy and cocky frontrunner against a slow but steady underdog, the Turtles have been winning the race. Just last week a Federal Court in New York affirmed a ruling that the satellite radio must pay the tab for pre ’72 public performance royalties. Judges in California have reached the same conclusion, and a Florida court is expected to rule on the issue soon.

So when it comes to listing the most influential animal-themed bands of the 20th Century, the Turtles may be an afterthought after BYRDS, ANIMALS, EAGLES, CRICKETS, and BEATLES; but all of these groups have either disbanded, been decimated by the ravages of time, or are infamously acrimonious. With their legal legacy, however, the TURTLES appear to be still Happy Together.

QUOTE OF THE DAY: “One of the nice things about a favorite pop song is that it’s an unconditional truce on judgment and musical snobbery. You like the song because you just do, and there need not be any further criticism.” Henry Rollins

Leave a comment

Filed under copyright, IP

No Direction Home?: British Boy Band One Direction Hits U.S. Shores and Trademark Shoals

“How does it feel?  To be on your own.  With no direction home.  Like a complete unknown.”  Bob Dylan

Those old enough to remember The Beatles debut may be surprised to learn that another British Invasion is underway a generation later.  Back in ’64, a nation roiled by tragedy discovered a quartet of musical savants, boyhood friends who honed their chops in the dank basement clubs of Liverpool and Hamburg.  A gifted producer, George Martin, molded their virtuosic talents to produce the greatest library of pop music the world has ever known.  When the cadaverous Ed Sullivan brought their infectious music into our living rooms on a winter’s eve, he instantly lifted the pall that had blanketed America since that dark Dallas day in November of ’63 and changed the world of music forever.

Today, our shores are graced by another collection of British lads, brought together by an even more formidable  impresario–Simon Cowell, the dyspeptic English architect of American Idol and The X-Factor.  The man whose scowl has sunk a thousand careers and launched several others.  This time, instead of a Fab Four, we have a pre-fab five called One Direction.  This band’s music has been percolating among tweens and teens for almost a year.  Now, One Direction is shattering the mainstream in a huge way.  The band has a number one album, outstripping the latest release by American icon Bruce Springsteen.  And they’ve had their own televised intro to the American viewing public via a coveted performance on Saturday Night Live.

By almost every measure, the “one direction” these phenoms seemed headed was up.  Nothing stood in the way of their meteoric rise–nothing that is except “softrights’ in the form of a trademark claim by another band by the same name–an unheralded American group also called One Direction.  Hailing from Los Angeles, that homegrown One Direction claims to have coined its name in 2009, well before the British belters even caught Simon Cowell’s ear.

If the American band’s claims of prior adoption and use pan out, it could spell trouble, with a capital T that stands for Trademark Infringement.  American trademark law gives ownership of a band name to the outfit that uses it first in this country.  With nothing to lose and everything to gain,  America’s One Direction has fired the opening salvo in a legal dispute that could wind up sending the British band to the wings.  In their complaint filed in a U.S. Federal court, the L.A. band seeks damages to the tune of $1 million as well as an injunction that would force Simon Cowell’s proteges to pick a new name.

The dispute is still in its infancy, but already, the British One Direction faces a stark choice, either pay the piper to continue using the name under which its accumulated fame and fortune, or take its chances before an American judge and Los Angeles jury.

Whatever the outcome, Simon Cowell’s “direction” in building his next international super group will surely include a visit with a U.S. trademark lawyer.  As for the American One Direction, the answer to Bob Dylan’s questions from “Like A Rolling Stone” is hardly blowin’ in the wind.  With their lawsuit taking center stage, being a complete unknown must feel pretty, pretty good.

Quote of the Day:  “If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will take you there.” George Harrison.


3 Comments

Filed under IP